Pakistan Cyber Force: Pakistan's defense

Top stories

Pakistan Cyber Force [Official]

Showing posts with label Pakistan's defense. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pakistan's defense. Show all posts

Monday, June 4, 2012

Pakistan’s Cruise Missile: The Only One In Asia?

Print Friendly and PDF


Tested four times, this is a ground-hugging, precision missile with stealth capabilities that can hit warships and carry 300 kiloton nuclear warhead. Pakistan today test fired its air-launched cruise missile (ALCM), the Hatf VIII (Ra’ad). This is the fourth successful test of the missile by the Pakistani Armed Forces. According to the Pakistani Armed Forces officials, the missile is capable of delivering both the nuclear and conventional high-explosive warheads.


The maximum effective operational range is estimated at 220 miles. This is the third successful test of a nuclear capable missile by the Pakistani Armed Forces within the last 30 days. Earlier, they had tested the Battlefield Range Ballistic Missile (BRBM) Nasr (Hatf-IX) this week and the Short Range Ballistic Missile (SRBM), the Hatf-III (Ghaznavi) on May 10th.


The Ra’ad is one of the four types of Land Attack Cruise Missiles currently operated by the Pakistani Armed Forces. Pakistan had inducted the Hatf VII (Babur), another land attack cruise missile on August 2005. They are also operating a number of the French-developed AS-30L and the American AGM-65 Maverick missiles.


The Ra’ad missile is equipped with stealth capabilities, which enables it to evade detection by enemy radars. The missile is fully indigenously-developed without any foreign technical assistance. It was jointly developed by the National Engineering and Scientific Commission (NESCOM) and the Air Weapons Complex (AWC), after the successful launch of another Pakistani cruise missile, the Hatf VII.

ISPR provided the following details on the matter:
The missile “enables Pakistan to achieve strategic standoff capability on land and at Sea. ‘Cruise Technology’ is extremely complex and has been developed by only a few countries in the world.  The state of the art Ra’ad Cruise Missile with Stealth Capabilities is a Low Altitude, Terrain Hugging Missile with high maneuverability, and can deliver nuclear and conventional warheads with pin point accuracy.
“A major additional feature of today’s test was the effective employment of the National Command Authority’s fully automated Strategic Command and Control Support System (SCCSS).  It has enabled robust Command and Control capability of all strategic assets with round the clock situational awareness in a digitized network centric environment to decision makers at National Command Centre (NCC).  The system has the added capability of real time remote monitoring of missile flight path.”


According to defense experts, the missile is one of the most accurate cruise missiles ever developed by any Asian nation. Ra’ad, which can be used for precision strikes on enemy strategic facilities such as radars, SAM batteries, and warships, can carry a nuclear warhead of up to 300 kiloton.


The missile was first tested on 25 August, 2007. Another successful test was carried out the following year, and the third test was carried out on April last year. The tests were carried out from the Pakistan Air Force’s (PAF) Dassault Mirage III ROSE fighter aircrafts.
(Pak Nationalists)
Pakistan Cyber Force

Monday, May 28, 2012

Yoam-e-Takbeer: The resolve continues!

Print Friendly and PDF

This day, fourteen year ago, emotionally charged voices of the team of nuclear scientists’ conducting the nuclear test in Chagi chanted ‘Naara-e- Takbeer, Allah-o- Akbar’. This was a declaration that hence forth Pakistan is a declared nuclear weapon capable state. Resource starved Pakistan had no ambition to go nuclear, but was compelled to do so.

India exploded its first nuclear device in 1974 under the guise of ‘Peaceful Nuclear Explosion. Thenceforth, India was a defacto nuclear power. Explosion was made possible through illegitimate diversion of fissile material from a civilian nuclear power plant provided to India by Canada. Event occurred shortly after the fall of Dhaka. It triggered survival instinct amongst the strategist community of Pakistan. Already faced with India’s overwhelming conventional military superiority, Pakistan was indeed pushed against the wall, left with no other choice but to develop a matching nuclear deterrent to ward off future Indian threats. Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto declared: “Pakistanis will eat grass but make a nuclear bomb”. Pakistan’s need for nuclearization was essentially security driven. Nation joyfully ate grass, and gleefully made the bomb.

Possession of nuclear weapons served the intended purpose; India has ever since been kept at bay despite temptations for military adventurism. Western attitude towards Pakistan’s nuclear programme was out rightly discriminatory; it attached religious shade to Pakistan’s bomb by calling it an ‘Islamic bomb’. Earlier, one had never heard of a Christian, a Communist, a Jewish or a Hindu bomb. The approach was myopic; rhetoric was a smoke screen to portray Islam as a synonym of aggression and mobilize support from vested interests to demonize Pakistan’s legitimate necessity. And then came the God-sent opportunity.

On 11 May 1998, Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee stunned the world by announcing that India had conducted three nuclear tests. Two days later, two additional tests were carried out. Dr. Samar Mubarakmand gave a technical assessment of India’s tests on behalf of the PAEC. He opined that there had been only one successful test on 11 May, and if a thermonuclear device had been fired then it had been a failure. Assessment was resoundingly accurate; India nuclear fraternity has conceded the reality after a decade.

On 28 May 1998, at 3:16 pm Pakistan conducted its first nuclear test. The time has been termed as “Pakistan’s Finest Hour”. Moments between 11 to 28 May witnessed interesting events. Prime Minister of that time, Mian Nawaz Sharif, recently narrated that during this period he consulted almost everybody for opinion and in the process when he sought Mr Majid Nizami’s views, the reply he received was stunning for him. Mr Majid Nizami had told him point blank that if he did not go ahead for a matching response, the people of Pakistan would shred him into mince. Former PM Benazir Bhutto advocated not only an immediate nuclear test by Pakistan, but also asserted that India should be disarmed by a preemptive attack. On 18 May 1998, the Chairman of the PAEC was given a go ahead. “Dhamaka kar dein” (Conduct the explosion) were the exact words used by the Prime Minister to inform him of the decision.

During this period Indian approach was mixed with arrogance, confusion and foolhardiness. At one time there arose a high probability of Indian air strikes over Chagi to destroy the site prior to test. Pakistan Air Force (PAF) reacted with lightening speed and created a protective umbrella over the test site. Dr Samar Mubarakmand, who was the team leader at the testing site, once narrated that while the PAF was in the process of doing its rapid deployments, the then Air Chief’s request was conveyed to him that the scientists should suspend the preparations for a couple of hours and vacate the test site for their personal safety till the PAF’s protective air cover was effectively in place. The entire team unanimously declined to leave the site and volunteered to continue the preparations.

They indeed deserve national salute for their courage. The extreme tension prevailing at the time of the tests is confirmed by the fact that five hours after prime Minister’s announcement of the tests, Pakistan summoned the Indian high commissioner to the foreign office and informed him that “credible information” had been received that an attack was to be mounted before dawn on Pakistan’s nuclear installations by India, and that “swift and massive retaliation” would result. The ambassador was asked to convey to New Delhi that Islamabad “expected the Indian government to desist from any irresponsible act.”

Excerpts from Prime Minister’s speech on 28 May 1998 amply explain the circumstances leading to Pakistan’s nuclearization.
He said: “Pakistan today successfully conducted five nuclear tests…I congratulate all Pakistani scientists, engineers and technicians for their dedicated team work and expertise in mastering complex and advanced technologies…Our security, and the peace and stability of the entire region, was gravely threatened. As any self-respecting nation, we had no choice left for us. Our hand was forced by the present Indian leadership’s reckless actions. We could not ignore the magnitude of the threat… Our decision to exercise the nuclear option has been taken in the interest of national self-defence… “


American led lobby has not yet reconciled with Pakistan’s nuclear status. Pakistan continues to face nuclear apartheid. America has signed Agreement 123 with India and has opened the flood gates of fissile material for India while it continues to pressure Pakistan to sign a Fissile Material Treaty that would freeze strategic asymmetry to Pakistan’s peril. Post 9/11 setting has provided yet another channel for Indo-Israeli-US nexus to malign Pakistan’s strategic assets. This time the strategy is to project the possibility of Pakistan’s nuclear assets falling in the hands of terrorists. Suggestions are often aired that Pakistan is at risk of succumbing to extremists, therefore, its nuclear assets should be disabled, seized or forcibly taken out.

The struggle is not yet over. However, as ever before, the nation stands united to defend its nuclear assets at all cost. Pakistan has made it clear that it would act decisively against any attempt by any quarter to harm its nuclear assets.


By Air Cdre Khalid Iqbal (R)

PCF

Friday, March 23, 2012

Pakistan National Defense University Alumni Association’s Sri Lankan Chapter Launched in Colombo

Print Friendly and PDF

Gen. Khalid Shameem Wyne
The Sri Lankan Chapter of Pakistan’s National Defense University Alumni Association was launched yesterday in an impressive ceremony held at Colombo. Pakistan’s visiting Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, General Khalid Shameem Wynne, NI (M) was the guest of honour at the event which was also attended by the High Commissioner of Pakistan in Sri Lanka HE Seema Ilahi Baloch. The Chief of Defense Staff Sri Lanka Air Chief Marshal WDRMJ Goonetileke and the Sri Lankan Army Commander Lt Gen Jagath Jayasuriya also attended the event alongwith the members of Alumni Association and a large number of prominent personalities of Sri Lanka.

The National Defense University Alumni Association is a platform for the Sri Lankan Officers of all three segments of the Armed Forces who attended training courses at the Pakistan’s National Defense University Islamabad. Air Chief Marshal WDRMJ Goonetileke, Chief of Defense Staff Sri Lanka is the Chief Patron of the Alumni Association. While, the High Commissioner of Pakistan in Sri Lanka is the Co patron of Alumni Association. 

The National Defense University (NDU) is the premier institution of Pakistan, catering for the needs of senior leadership from various segments of the society, both domestic and international, in comprehending security issues and policy / strategy formulation. The NDU is a center of excellence in academic and research pursuits in diversified disciplines providing well thought out inputs on national security at strategic level. The University imparts higher education in policy and strategy formulation at various tiers with emphasis on national security and defense, and act as a national think tank. 

Several Senior Sri Lankan Officers from Armed forces have been attending courses at the National Defense University annually since 1993. Currently the NDU Alumni Association has 26 members, who hold highly significant assignments in their respective institutions in all the segments of the Sri Lankan Armed Forces. 

The launch of the Association during the visit of the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee Pakistan to Sri Lanka is of immense importance as the time tested relationship between the two friendly countries is transforming on to a different pedestal of association after the war ended in Sri Lanka. It is relevant to add that Pakistan is one of those very few countries which provided all out support to Sri Lankan stance at the UNHRC Session.

The relationship between Pakistan and Sri Lanka is based on mutual trust and commonality of interest in maintaining regional peace, security and stability. Pakistan has always supported the unity, territorial integrity and sovereignty of Sri Lanka. Both countries have shared common perceptions on almost all regional and international issue and are working together on all these forums for shared values and interests 

Since independence, Sri Lanka and Pakistan have consistently maintained close, cordial and mutually supportive relations especially in the field of defense. Both nations have assisted each other during testing times in their histories. 

Pakistan and Sri Lanka have comprehensive and mutually beneficial training collaboration for Army, Navy and Air Force. Over a period of time, a strong bond of commitment and mutual understanding has been reached between both the friendly armed forces. In future too, both the brotherly countries are expected to work more closely in the field of defense to boost peace efforts in the region.
(Asian Tribune)


Xharaf Vsm
Pakistan Cyber Force

Saturday, March 10, 2012

It's time to say GOOD BYE to USZ: DPC

Print Friendly and PDF

MULTAN - Like other parts of the country, Yaum-e-Yakjehti Balochistan (Balochistan Solidarity Day) was observed by the activists of Difa-e-Pakistan Council (DPC) in the entire South Punjab region on Friday. The clerics condemned American and Indian intervention in Balochistan during their juma sermons and adopted condemnation resolutions against the supporters of the USZ. The DPC activists brought out rallies and held demonstrations in all areas of South Punjab including Multan, Dera Ghazi Khan and Bahawalpur divisions. They shouted slogans against the USZ and India and burnt their flags.

The DPC held a big show in Multan as a large number of activists of its member parties like Jamaatud Dawa, Jamiat Ahle Hadith, Ahle Sunnat Waljamat, Muttahidda Shehri Mahaaz, Jamaat-e-Islami, Majlis-e-Ehrar, All Pakistan Power Looms Associations, Al-Muhammadiya Students gathered at Chowk Ghanta Ghar after juma prayers and staged a demo. Addressing the protesters, Kh Saifur Rehman Siddiqui, Rana Shamshad Salfi, Hafiz Abdul Ghaffar, Hafiz Saif Ullah Azam, Mufti Abdul Rehman Shaheen, Tariq Naeem Ullah and others demanded of the government to immediately halt all overt and covert operations in Balochistan.

They stressed upon the government to form pro-Pakistan foreign and internal policies while keeping in view national interests. They said that the residents of Balochistan were true Muslims and patriot Pakistanis and allegations of treason against them were baseless. They declared that the DPC would raise voice for all legal, human and national rights of Balochs at all platforms. They claimed that America and her allies wanted to snatch precious natural resources of Balochistan and agencies like CIA, RAW and Mossad were behind entire unrest in the province. They said that the time had come to breach all ties with USZ and say her good bye.
(The Nation)
Mildly edited by Enticing Fury
Pakistan Cyber Force

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Is ISI essential for National Security?

Print Friendly and PDF

Every country has a superior intelligence agency to protect the national security of the state. It not only copes with foreign anti-state elements, but also fights the psychological warfare including internal enemies. No army can fight without the support of an efficient secret agency which collects and assesses information in a most reliable manner. American CIA, Russian KGB, British MI-6 etc. might be cited as an instance.

In these terms, especially since 9/11, the role of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) was further increased to protect the country from external and internal threat, while fighting war against terrorism. In this respect, Pakistan has been facing multiple subversive acts being conducted by secret agencies like American CIA Indian RAW and Israeli Mossad which have been creating unrest in our country on massive scale. Penetration of foreign agents along with sophisticated weaponry, suicide attacks and targeted killings have become every day occurrence in the country.

When Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha became the Director General of the ISI in September, 2008, he took a number of steps to further improve the efficiency of the agency, responsible for collecting information and providing critical national security intelligence assessment to the Pakistan government. First of all, Gen. Pasha closed the internal wing of the agency. At that time, intermittently, US high officials and media have been accusing Pakistan’s army and our superior spy agency of close contacts with the Afghan Taliban and cross-border terrorism in Afghanistan. Under the pretext of these false allegations, US top officials started insisting upon Pakistan that ISI should be restructured. In this connection, the then Assistant Secretary of State, Richard Boucher had stated that ISI needed to be reformed. But when ISI DG, Shuja Pasha refused to restructure the agency on the pattern of US, blame game by America and India intensified against the agency and its chief.

It was due to the rejection of American undue demands by Gen. Pasha and his positive performance to protect the national interests of the country that with the tactical support of CIA, RAW and Mossad accelerated subversive acts in Pakistan, especially targeting ISI sub-headquarters, located in Lahore, Multan and Peshawar besides attacking the personnel of the agency at various places.

At the same time, Islamabad continued its counter-terrorism and intelligence sharing cooperation with America. In this regard, ISI captured a number of renowned Al Qaeda commanders in Pakistan, and foiled many terrorist attempts through pre-arrests of the militants. For example in February, 2010, with the help of ISI, nine Taliban insurgents including the Afghan Taliban’s second in command, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar was arrested in Karachi. In that context, US high officials, while praising this key agency, admitted that Pakistan is cooperating with the US in relation to war on terror.


Despite all of this, under the supervision of Lt. Gen. Shuja Pasha, ISI prefered the external and internal security of Pakistan. Externally, through its invisible mechanism, it castigated the anti-Pakistan plot of the US India and Israel—also against China and became an obstacle in the secret strategic designs of these hostile elements.

Internally, ISI has thwarted the anti-Pakistan activities of the agents of Blackwater-US notorious private security firm in the country. Under the pretext of providing security to its embassies, US had deployed a network of espionage in Pakistan. In this respect, Blackwater and CIA started recruiting Pakistani nationals who were vulnerable and could work on their payroll. In this context, with the pre-information of ISI, Pakistan’s police and other security agencies arrested a number of agents. For instance, on September 19, 2009, police raided the Inter-Risk, a private security company in Islamabad, and arrested its two employees, namely Tauqeer and Muhammad Khan, possessing unlicensed shotguns, handguns and ammunition. On the other side, US embassy spokesperson Richard Snelsire pretended, “The US contract with the Inter-Risk is to provide security at the embassy and consulates.”

Besides, on many occasions, ISI helped in stopping the secret activities of the CIA agents who were traveling in vehicles, covered with black mirrors—showing themselves as diplomats. Sometimes weapons were snatched from them, and sometimes they were sent back to Islamabad. However, differences started between Pakistan and America as ISI interrupted covet activities of these so-called diplomats. In this respect, on the information of this top spy agency, Pakistan’s establishment expelled several American spies operating in the country. On the other side, US withheld $800 million in military aid to punish its military and ISI.

Meanwhile, Gen. Shuja Pasha became a special target of CIA and RAW. In this context, with the backing of Indo-Israeli lobbies, a case was filed against Pasha in New York, accusing him of facilitating the Mumbai bombings of November 26, 2008, which was, in fact, arranged by the non-stat actors in connivance with RAW. Question arises as to why a case was not registered against the US ex-President Bush and President Obama who were responsible for the illegal occupation of Iraq and massacre of thousands of people there including Afghanistan and other Islamic countries in the name of war on terror.

However, during his meeting with the CIA Director Michael Morell in July, 2011, Lt. Gen. Shuja Pasha flatly told that we would continue anti-terror and intelligence sharing cooperation between the two agencies, but would never tolerate a private ‘network’ the CIA is secretly maintaining in Pakistan.

In the aftermath of the Osama’s death on May 2011, US and Indian rulers including their media intensified their campaign against Pak Army and ISI. In this regard, in the in-camera session of the parliament, Islamabad decided to review its relationship with the United States. BBC quoted DG ISI Shuja Pasha, saying that Osama’s compound in Abbottbad was registered under a fake name. Earlier, he said that after the Tora Bora operation, Osama Bin Laden became an enemy of Pakistan. Nevertheless, it was US intelligence failure as its CIA which is well-equipped with modern technology failed in detecting Osama in ten years. According to BBC, Pasha explained, “Nobody expressed their condolences over the 78 officials of the ISI who have been killed.”

It is of particular attention that it was due to the professional competence of ISI under the Shuja Pasha in foiling the anti-Pakistan conspiracy that US and India accelerated their propaganda against him and the agency. In this connection, in the recent past, US Admiral Mike Mullen (R) alleged that the Haqqani network is waging a ‘proxy war’ in Afghanistan with the assistance of ISI, and blamed for an assault on the US embassy in Kabul on September 20, 2011. But US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton admitted that there was no evidence about ISI about the bombing of US embassy, while US top officials are still alleging this agency for cross-border terrorism. It shows American double game not only with Pakistan, but also with is superior spy agency.

Meanwhile, while briefing the participants of the All Parties Conference, ISI Chief indicated that Haqqani network has no presence in Pakistan as it has its base in Afghanistan. Pak Army and civil government also rejected US pressure tactics to do more against the Haqqani network in the North Waziristan as suggested by ISI Chief Lt. Gen. Shuja Pasha. Besides, when on November 26, 2011, unprovoked air firing by the US-led NATO on Pakistan Army outposts in Mohmand Agency killed 24 troops, Pakistan decided to review its engagement with the US and its other allies. For this purpose, the envoys’ conference deliberated on the country’s foreign policy on December 12, 2011, and ISI Chief Lt. Gen. Pasha briefed the participants about the intentional NATO strikes.

Notably, it is most regrettable that without knowing the ground realities and the services of ISI, just like the foreign enemy and their media, our rulers, some political leaders and media anchors are dis-reputing Pak Army—particularly ISI DG Shuja Pasha in connection with the memogate issue, while Gen. Pasha has left it to the Supreme Court to decide the case. In this context, what the difference one can note between our political leaders and media anchors who speak in tone of Pakistan’s external enemies in maligning ISI and its chief. It seems that some of our politicians and journalists are either on the payroll of US-led anti-Pakistan entities or they want to get good coverage in the western media by targeting ISI. No doubt their such acts are benefiting the US and India which want to create a division between Pakistan’s civil and security agencies so as to cause further unrest in the country. Instead of implicating ISI and its DG, Shuja Pasha, our internal elements must better know the services of this intelligence agency in thwarting various conspiracies against the integrity of the Pakistan, especially against its nuclear assets. Despite its limited resources as compared to CIA, RAW and Mossad, ISI has never failed in its goals. No doubt, ISI is essential for national security of Pakistan.
(KashmirWatch)


By Sajjad Shaukat who writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relation


Pakistan Cyber Force

Monday, February 20, 2012

"Go America go", "No to NATO" powerfully chants Difa-e-Pakistan

Print Friendly and PDF

Tens of thousands of  Pakistanis poured onto the streets of Islamabad on the 20th Februaury, chanting "death to America", offended at USZ's unnecessary overwhelming intervention in the country's internal affairs and plans to disintegrate Baluchistan as passed in the American Congress earlier.

"Today, we have gathered here to raise a voice of protest against US intervention in Pakistan
," Haq told. Also present was member Former DG ISI General Hamid Gul, who headed Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency during the 1980s Pakistani-sponsored war against Soviet troops in Afghanistan.

Haq further said, “America wants to break Pakistan into pieces,” Haq said, in reference to the resolution in America, introduced by Congressman Dana Rohrabacher which calls upon Pakistan to recognise the Baloch right to self determination. “Our protest is against the possible resumption of Nato supplies, US and Indian occupation and to strengthen the country’s defence.

His membership has helped fuel suspicions that Pakistan's security establishment is backing the coalition as a means of exerting pressure on the weak government and whipping up rhetoric against the unpopular US alliance.

The council has been able to attract large crowds in its recent rallies. Allah Buksh, a senior police official, said 2,500 attended the Monday demonstration as it got underway, but witnesses estimated the crowd at 3,500 as hundreds of riot police, armed with batons and wearing bullet-proof jackets stood guard.

“America can never be our friend, it is our biggest enemy. America will be defeated in Afghanistan and divided into pieces,” Mian Aslam, a former JI lawmaker said in his address to the rally. “Go America Go”, “No to NATO”, “Arrogant Americans – others are also human beings” and “the chains of slavery will now break up”, the participants exclaimed.

“The friend of the US is a traitor”, “the friend of (Pakistani President Asif Ali) Zardari is a traitor” and “the friend of (Afghan President Hamid) Karzai is a traitor”, rightly shouted the crowd.

The rally of Jamat-e-Islami (JI), led by Rawalpindi chapter chief Dr Kamal Ameer, also took off to Aabpara Chowk from Liaqat Bagh Rawalpindi. Other party leaders, along with more than 2,000 activists of ASWJ, gathered in the office of ASWJ to participate in the sit-in, said Usmani

Xharaf Vsm
Pakistan Cyber Force

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Constitution - Country's protection or destruction? (Intelligent analysis)

Print Friendly and PDF

If you can understand the following wisdom, no political snake or media anchor can ever fool you about law, constitution and wisdom of the law.
The Constitution is a man made document designed to facilitate governance. The objective of a written constitution is to protect the state not to destroy it. It gives a general guidelines to decide the rules of the government. But it is humanly impossible to write every threat, scenario and possibility which a dynamic country or nation faces during its civilizational life cycle. Britain does not have a written constitution but they follow tradition, needs of the time and requirements of national security to make new laws and do what is needed to protect their interest.

Nations which are born free always use their wise judgement to carve out new laws and policies from the established principles. In our deen also, we have "Ijtihad" and "Ijmaa" to find new responses to new challenges. The mullahs in deen always resist Ijtihad as they are close minded bigots. Similarly, the political "mullahs" always resist interpretation of Constitution which hurts their vested interests.

Today, Pakistan faces a similar crises. Constitution had never envisioned such a treacherous President and PM and political government, which have taken power illegally violating every constitutional clause and law.

Constitution says no one can come into the parliament if they violate article 62,63 of the constitution. But what to do if this regime has come gate crashing through the NRO? This entire government is illegitimate, illegal and immoral.

Constitution says the President must appoint the caretaker government. But the Constitution does not say how to appoint the caretaker if the President is the traitor writing Memo to foreign powers to destroy the country?

Constitution says caretakers must hold elections within 90 days. But the constitution does not says what to do if the country is under 4thGW and on the brink of NATO/US/Indian invasion. Elections will destroy the country but the constitution has no idea of the threats and wars imposed on the country.

Constitution says that Judiciary must decide cases of terrorism but the constitution is silent on what to do if the judiciary does not hang a single terrorist in the last 11 years despite the country being in the state of war. Chief justice does not allow the army to make military courts but himself is silent why his own constitutional courts are breaking the constitution by not doing their duty?

This is the crisis the country face today. We do not have to follow the constitution in letter in spirit if it does not have answers to the present challenges. We need Ijtihad in the constitution to respond to the present challenges. Supreme Court must not act as "constitutional Mullah" but should do a dynamic ijtihad and interpretations to respond to the threats Pakistan is facing. CJ and the SC are not defense and security analysts. They must take advice from army to interpret the Constitution in the light of threats we face today.

Army and Supreme court must restore order first before any elections, else following the constitution would destroy the country. President cannot be trusted to select caretakers. Army/Supreme court must do it else its anarchy!

To hell with demon-cracy if it brings such corrupt traitors. The whole system is illegal. We want security and defense of Pakistan and a strong patriotic government. The present Constitution does NOT have answers. In that case, SC and army must do what is right, not what is written in the man made law.
By Defense expert - Zaid Hamid
Pakistan Cyber Force

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...