Pakistan Cyber Force: World reduction plan

Showing posts with label World reduction plan. Show all posts

Monday, September 24, 2012

World Awakens To Massive GMO Dangers

The study was the first to ever examine the true effects of lifelong GMO consumption in rats.

Pakistan Cyber Force

Follow PCF on Facebook

Follow PCF on Twitter

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

GMOs Cause Infertility in Animals : Russian Scientists

A study presented at the Days of Defense Against Environmental Hazards in Russia has unveiled once again the implicit dangers associated with the consumption of genetically-modified organisms (GMOs). According to Voice of Russia, scientists from the National Association for Gene Security and the Institute of Ecological and Evolutional Problems discovered that animals fed GMOs as part of their normal diet eventually develop the inability to reproduce.

A shocking revelation; the study is one of several that has identified a link between GMO consumption and infertility in recent years. And because it was conducted independently of the biotechnology industry, it came to far different conclusions than have most of the studies offered up for mainstream consumption in defense of GMOs.

Using hamsters as the test subjects, scientists observed that consumption of GM soybeans, which have never been a part of these creatures’ normal diets, tended to slow sexual maturity and gradually eliminate the ability to reproduce. After several generations, hamsters consuming the “Frankensoy” eventually lost their innate ability to reproduce.

“We selected several groups of hamsters, kept them in pairs in cells and gave them ordinary food as always,” said Dr. Alexei Surov, one of the authors of the study. “We did not add anything for one group but the other was fed with soya that contained no GM components, while the third group with some content of Genetically Modified Organisms and the fourth one with increased amount of GMO.”

Dr. Surov and his team then monitored the various groups of cubs, including their rates of growth and birthing frequencies, and compared their findings to the cubs’ diets. After several generations of cubs breeding with each other, the team observed that those cubs who ate GMOs as part of their diet eventually became completely sterile.

“[W]e noticed quite a serious effect when we selected new pairs from [the] cubs and continued to feed them as before,” added Dr. Surov. “These pairs’ growth rate was slower and reached their sexual maturity slowly. When we got some of their cubs, we formed the new pairs of the third generation. We failed to get cubs from these pairs, which were fed with GM foodstuffs. It was proved that these pairs lost their ability to give birth to their cubs.”

Will widespread GMO consumption make future generations of humans infertile?

An Austrian study uncovered similar harm in mice that consumed GM corn. An immediate consequence among the mice eating the “Frankencorn” was that their offspring weighed less than normal, and overall litter size became smaller. After three or four generations, mice who came from GMO-eating parents and grandparents became completely infertile. (http://www.naturalnews.com)

Farmers across the U.S. have also reported infertility among pigs and cows that consume GM feed. And in India, an investigatory team observed infertility and other serious problems among buffalo that were consuming GM cottonseed.

Pakistan Cyber Force

Follow PCF on Facebook

Follow PCF on Twitter

Monday, July 30, 2012

Pentagon Prepares Millions of Vaccines Against Future Global Flu

The Pentagon’s DARPA lab has announced a milestone, but it doesn’t involve drones or death missiles. Scientists at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency say they’ve produced 10 million doses of an influenza vaccine in only one month’s time.

In a press release out of the agency’s office this week, scientists with DARPA say they’ve reach an important step in being able to combat a flu pandemic that might someday decimate the Earth’s population. By working with the Medicago Inc. vaccine company, the Pentagon’s cutting edge research lab says that they’ve used a massive harvest of tobacco plants to help produce a plethora of flu-fighting vaccines.

“Testing confirmed that a single dose of the H1N1 VLP influenza vaccine candidate induced protective levels of hem agglutinin antibodies in an animal model when combined with a standard aluminium adjuvant,” the agency writes, while still noting, though, that “The equivalent dose required to protect humans from natural disease can only be determined by future, prospective clinical trials.”

Researchers have before relied on using chicken eggs to harvest compounds to use in influenza vaccines. With a future outbreak requiring scientists to step up with a solution as soon as possible, though, they’ve turned to tobacco plants to help produce the vaccines.

“Vaccinating susceptible populations during the initial stage of a pandemic is critical to containment,” Dr. Alan Magill, DARPA program manager, says in an official statement. “We’re looking at plant-based solutions to vaccine production as a more rapid and efficient alternative to the standard egg-based technologies and the research is very promising.”

The World Health Organization has gone on the record to say that as much as half of the people on the planet could be affected by a pandemic in the near future, and it could take as much as nine months for a vaccine for a pandemic virus strain to become made available. With the lives of billions of people across the world at stake, DARPA has been trying to determine new ways of churning out antidotes in as little time as possible. Now its researchers say, that in only a month, scientists “produced more than 10 million doses (as defined in an animal model) of an H1N1 influenza vaccine candidate based on virus-like particles (VLP).”

Through DARPA’s previously established Blue Angel program, researchers have spent several years searching for new ways to produce mass quantities of vaccine-grade protein that could be used to combat what they say are very real emerging and novel biological threats.

Andy Sheldon, Chief Executive Officer of Medicago , says in the company’s own press release that “The completion of the rapid fire test marks a substantial achievement in demonstrating our technology and the potential for Medicago to be the first responder in the event of a pandemic flu outbreak.”

Medicago’s research was conducted in a 97,000-square-foot vaccine facility in North Carolina that was funded through a $21 million Technology Investment Agreement with DARPA.

Pakistan Cyber Force

Follow PCF on Facebook

Follow PCF on Twitter

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Depopulating The Third World: UN Sterilization Campaigns In Developing Countries Accelerating

“The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”

From a MIT lecture by professor Penny Chisholm.
For over half a century demographers at the United Nations have attempted to “convince” people from both developing and developed nations to limit their households to one child. In the decades after WW2 no means were spared in order to get this message across. Radio, television, newspapers were cleverly used to reach people in the remotest areas. By the mid-seventies, all available instruments of propaganda were strategically set in motion, with taxpayer’s money to spare and lots of “human resources” to scale back (as social engineers prefer to call us). The justification that could be given to the Western middle class was wonderfully simple: under the guise of developing the undeveloped, the UN sold its Third World population agenda. Simultaneously the developing nations were propagandized into surrendering their people’s birthright to procreate and multiply- two things our species is prone to do.

All those resisting the onslaught of information were characterized as a scourge on the environment. Because the eugenicists have an enemy that is not easily defeated, namely human instinct and dignity, it was crucial to discredit human nature first, making it suspect, while replacing human nature with an artificially created “shadow nature” which readily rejects notions such as life and liberty, embracing covert eugenics and tyranny instead. Although the UN in the west has learned to speak of “sustainable development” when speaking of population control, their language in developing countries has been more crude, more closely resembling the original eugenic tongue on how best to keep their populations in check.

Despite all these efforts the overall human population has increased. The UN began to grow restless and less impressed with its own propaganda efforts. In the West populations may have decreased, in the developing world they increased all the more. More drastic measures began to be proposed for the Third World with the aim of speeding up the population agenda. From the beginning of this century onwards all kinds of horror-stories began dripping in, describing among other things state-sponsored sterilization policies in the Third World.

Uzbekistan

In 2010, the British Independent featured an AP article detailing suspicions that health officials in the Republic of Uzbekistan are widely involved in involuntary sterilization-practices. The AP-reporter spoke with a 24-year old housewife named Saodat Rakhimbayeva, an extremely brave woman who tells a heart-wrenching tale of state-sponsored eugenics in her home country of Uzbekistan. After giving birth to a premature boy, she had to witness her son dying just three days later.

“Then”, states the article, “came a further devastating blow: She learned that the surgeon had removed part of her uterus during the operation, making her sterile.”

“According to rights groups, victims and health officials, Rakhimbayeva is one of hundreds of Uzbek women who have been surgically sterilized without their knowledge or consent in a program designed to prevent overpopulation from fueling unrest.(…). The order comes from the very top,” said Khaitboy Yakubov, head of the Najot human rights group in Uzbekistan.”

This statement by Yakubov has more significance that he himself probably realizes. By “the very top” he likely refers to the central Uzbek government. As it turns out, the order came from even higher up. An official communiqué from the embassy of Uzbekistan in New Delhi gives us more insight in a remarkable initiative by the Uzbek state and the different partners with which it collaborates:

“The complex of measures for the “Mother’s and Child’s Screening”, directed to prevent the childbirth with the hereditary diseases, accompanying with intellectual backwardness as well as inspection of pregnant women is carried out in the Republic with the purpose of revealing anomalies of development of a child-bearing. (…). Within the framework of the State Programs the cooperation is continuing with the WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, USAID, JICA, KfW Bank, World Bank, Asian Development Bank (…).”

The United Nations Population Fund concurs. It admits helping Uzbek authorities screen its citizens: “In Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan, UNFPA worked to strengthen national capacities to collect, analyze and disseminate gender disaggregated data on population, development and reproductive health and to integrate population variables and gender concerns into development and environmental planning.”

Now what this really mean? A Japanese International Corporation Agency, profiling Uzbekistan’s disability policies, states the following in regards to the Uzbek national screening program (page 11): “By 2001, 124.000 of new-borns had been examined, 2.800 children in at-risk groups had been identified; and 160 had been registered in health clinics. For genetic reasons, 1.381 pregnancies were terminated.”

Furthermore, an Uzbek government-website acknowledges receiving generous funding for its eugenic programs and restates the UN-funded mission: “Up-to-date medical technologies help detect possible defects in the development of a fetus at an early stage of pregnancy. To preclude birth of children with genetic disease accompanied by mental abnormalities and to detect fetus abnormality (…).”

Another Uzbek government website gave a description of the ultimate goal of the “Mother and Child screening” program as follows: “(…) reducing the birth of disabled children.” In the same publication, the above-mentioned “screening” of possible “intellectual backwardness” serves to “prevent childbirth with hereditary diseases”.

Interestingly the link to that webpage is now dead. However they can not erase away the fact that these practises constitute eugenics in its purest form. And transnational organizations like the UN, World Bank and the German KfW Bank are directly and fanatically involved in the funding of these “screening”-programs conducted by Uzbek health authorities. The UN itself admits in its own publications to its “long-standing partnership and track-record working in Uzbekistan.”:

“The UN’s mandate in supporting the implementation and monitoring of the MDGs (UN Millennium Development Goals) at the country level is a substantial comparative advantage in assisting the Government (of Uzbekistan) to enhance living standards, and achieve higher levels of human development. As a credible and trusted partner of the Government, we provide policy advice, technical assistance and programmatic support, drawing on best global practices.”

An important item of the UN’s “programmatic support” is their ideas on population-screening and control, making sure that Uzbek women: “… have access, as and when they require, to what we call reproductive health.- family planning, contraception, and medical care during pregnancy, at delivery and afterwards.”

In a publication by USAID, the largest US aid institution paid for by US tax dollars, reference was made to the contributions of the United Nations Population Fund: “UNFPA provided IUD’s, injectables and pills. Health facilities hold at least 3 different methods, though their quantities are not sufficient.”
In regards to USAID’s own contributions, which include training local Uzbek health officials, the document lists a training-course:

“The two week-training included theory and extensive practise. Each participant passing the course received a set of instruments for minilaporotomy. During training courses 39 clients were sterilized. 88 clients have been sterilized by trained providers to date.”

Another USAID-document from 1993 recommends some actions to be taken in regards to Central European nations, such as Uzbekistan (page 10):
“New contraceptive technologies should be offered, with training in their application and in the counseling of clients on the choices available to them. Policy change will be required in some countries to permit sterilization to be included among available options for both women and men. To assure the commitment of health sector leadership, study tours in the united States would be useful, as would inclusion of the heads of medical training institutions in the redesign of medical and nursing curricula to integrate family planning into health care.”

Remember the reports from the Uzbek woman reporting involuntary sterilization practices by Uzbek doctors. It seems it is being done with US taxpayer dollars, and with additional donations from the World Bank, German development bank, the United Nations Population Fund- and let’s not leave out another important contributor, the World Health Organization. The WHO reports on their own website:

“Uzbekistan and WHO: A close relationship exists between WHO and the Ministry of Health (MOH).” Listed under “Opportunities”, the WHO mentions that: “Uzbekistan now receives substantial funding for health programmes with contributions from many key partners.”

India

According to a report out of India earlier this year, several victims of forced sterilization by state officials have come forward, providing bone-chilling evidence of widespread sterilization practices in Madhya Pradesh, a huge province in India’s heartland. An item carried by India Today, under the header “conned into sterilization” features no less than 8 victims of Indian government officials, who routinely round up citizens and sterilize them just to meet the state’s family planning targets. As it turns out, it’s not just the state’s targets they are meeting. Every time some chicken-necked eugenicist grabs a surgical knife, it is the desires of the UN and World Health Organization he’s satisfying.

The victims interviewed include a 98-year old man and an 80-year old man, both of whom were forced to undergo vasectomy. Government officials threatened the men with withholding their social benefits if they refused. “While these men got to live the life they wanted till a ripe old age, 24-year old Jamuna Kori of Sidhi district was not so lucky. One day, he was just picked up from a road by two men, sterilised and left on the highway again.”

The article, written by correspondent Rahul Singh, also features a woman who was drugged into submission: “They gave me something to drink and I fell unconscious. When I woke up I realized they had operated on me. I want an inquiry”. The video also shows several mentally challenged individuals, who were not even threatened but just directly operated upon. The clip also features a 25 year old man who took his 2 year old son for an anti-rabies vaccine after the boy was bitten by a dog. The doctors told the man they would only treat his son if the father would undergo sterilization. The Telegraph carried an article recently about this case, in which the young father said:

“My son’s life was more important. I was told private hospitals charge 900 Rupees (£11) for each injection,” he told The Indian Express.” “In 2010”, states a 2011 article out of New Delhi, “Madhya Pradesh achieved a record sterilization target of 645,000, luring villagers with freebies such as mobile phones, two-wheelers and gold coins to undergo sterilization.” But now, in 2012, it seems the eugenicists in the UN are loosing patience as now they just order people picked up from the road to have them drugged and sterilized.

In an ad put out by the UNFPA (the United Nations Population Fund) for the job of family planning consultant (7 vacancies) the candidates are being informed about the reasons for more hands: “Given that the presence of the private sector is marginal, there is major client load on the public health system. Hence, if sterilization services in Madhya Pradesh have to pick up, public health system has to gear itself and other options of public–private partnership, wherever feasible, will have to be explored.”

Another piece of evidence that the sterilisation-efforts contributed to the state is actually being coordinated by the UNFPA: “It is proposed to have a dedicated technical person in the office of divisional joint director, as divisional family planning consultant, supported by UNFPA. The consultant would be physically located in the office of divisional joint director health services and will work under direct administrative and technical control of joint director health services.”

In fact, these practices are being conducted worldwide- always with the help of the same old modus operandi: the World Bank and their UN partners constrict sovereign nations to the point of them accepting trading-“privileges”. In order to safeguard a seat around the transnational table, these nations- often struggling with widespread poverty- accept every and any condition by the lender of last resort (IMF, World Bank). These conditions are far from secret. They are actually right out in the open. This latest Indian horror story is further evidence of the fact that not the Indian state is the initiator of these forced sterilization policies, as the article by Rahul Singh argues. It is the UNFPA rather, the enforcement arm of the eugenicists, which both sets the standards, provides the technology, recruits the medical personnel, and- on a global level- enforces these sterilization policies through binding treaties and other supranational strangleholds.

In the context of the 2011 UN’s World Population Day several developing nations were quick to pledge allegiance to the eugenic deity. In the east-Indian state of Bihar, officials put out the announcement that: “The Bihar government will soon formulate a new population control policy. The policy will be framed in collaboration with the United Nations Population Fund (UNPF).”
Another Indian state, Karnataka, had President Gladys Almeida “observe World Population Day” at which event she told local government employees:
“There is a need to create an awareness on the need for population control.”

Another individual present said:
“as the population increases, nature takes its own method to control it.”
Another compliant nation, Pakistan, had their Federal Minister for Population Welfare Firdous Aashiq Awan announce that: “The government is taking serious measures to control population growth in the country.” The government in Islmabad even recruits religious leaders (a trick stolen from the UN) in order to sell population control to the masses:

“(…) religious leaders are being empowered. For the first time, ‘Imam Masjid’ is being made a partner in population Welfare programmes. He would act as a social mobilizer, she (Awan) added.” These pledges of allegiance to the UN and their set goals of reducing human numbers are not exclusively made by developing countries. Developed countries have accustomed themselves with the same line of reasoning. The only difference is that, as of yet, the language has been more “friendly”, masking the true purpose of the scientific dictatorship implemented.

China

Via news outlet the Global Times, the Chinese State in 2010 lamented the “issue of unauthorized births” in light of the UN’s stated goal of “efficient population control.” The UN’s World population Day, July 11, was originally set up in 1989 by the Governing Council of the United Nations Development Programma to “raise awareness of global population issues.” “The theme of this year’s (2010) 21st World Population Day”, mentions the article, “is “Everyone Counts”, and the activities in China will focus on the 2010 population census and emphasize the right to life.”

“In China”, the article goes on to say, “the issue of unauthorized births is at the forefront of its efforts to control the growth of its population as it undermines the country’s family planning policy, or “one-child policy”, which was implemented in 1980.” “According to Chinese statistics, the national population reached 1.3 billion at the end of 2008, with 6.7 million born that year. Unauthorized births accounted for a large percentage of those births.”

“Since the family planning policy was implemented, local governments strictly controlled the births of each family, and allowed each couple to have one child, but with a more flexible policy in China’s ethnic minority areas. However, not all couples obeyed the rules (…).”

Besides the horrible “obeyed the rules”, the bone chilling term “unauthorized births” is used several times in the article to describe families exceeding their allowance of babies they decide to put on this earth. As we know, having more than one baby provokes direct interference from the Chinese State, which can tax, fine, threaten and even terminate the new life considered by the all-powerful state to be a burden on the environment. The article also mentions the existence of a “household contract responsibility system”- created nationwide to make sure the population control policies would be strictly carried out. Such a slave-state is exactly what the UN envisions for their desired world government. Although the UN itself tempers the tongue when it comes to their stated goal of reducing the world’s population, the Chinese authorities know exactly what goals the UN expects them to pursue:
“It (the UN) also aims to stress the importance of efficient population control by means of collecting and analyzing the latest data so as to make an impact on decision-making and improve people’s lives.”

A statement written for World Population Day by the Secretary-General of the UN reads as follows: “On this World Population Day, I call on decision-makers everywhere to make each and every person count. Only by considering the needs of all women and men,girls and boys,can we achieve the Millennium Development Goals and advance the shared values of the United Nations.”

These shared values were described in detail by UN’s Agenda 21:
“(…) a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced: a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.”

The stifling silence that envelops this subject in developed nations, will only make it easier for the UN to go ahead with their population policies in developing ones. And to anyone in the West who thinks strict population policies in the Third World are sad but necessary, I would like to point out that under a global government, or “global governance” as the UN prefers to say, developed and developing nations alike are subject to its decrees. So every time we wave these facts away like an irritating fly, be assured it will come back to haunt us.

By Jurriaan Maessen

(ExplosiveReports.Com)

Pakistan Cyber Force

Follow PCF on Facebook

Follow PCF on Twitter

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Cancer: The Ultimate Soft-Kill Operation

In earlier times it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill a million people. Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people then to control a million people. - Zbigniew Brzezinski (Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Carter/Obama Advisor)

The cancer epidemic is a soft-kill operation and a move by the world’s so-called elites to cull the human population. It is well documented that the Club of Rome, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, the Rockefellers, Warren Buffet and many other globalists plan to dominate and decimate humanity with their population reduction agenda.

As we will see, the globalists first cause the cancer and then provide us with their ineffective treatments (not cures) for profit. This method is known as Problem – Reaction – Solution.

According to the American Cancer Society, 1,638,910 new cancer cases will arise in the United States during 2012. Approximately 577,190 American cancer patients are expected to die from their cancer this year as well. One in every two men will suffer from cancer (one in four will die) as will one in every three women (one in five will die). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cancer is the second leading cause of death, closely trailing heart disease.

In 1971, President Nixon and Congress declared war on cancer. Since then, the federal government has spent well over $105 billion to battle cancer. In 2010 alone, the National Cancer Institute had a budget of $6.4 billion. As of March 2011, the Susan B. Komen Foundation, allegedly leading the fight against breast cancer, had $439,451,449 in “total public support and revenue.” Pharmaceutical giant Merck alone had a 2010 research and development budget of 8.12 billion.

Why all the death and suffering despite billions, if not trillions, in government and private cancer research? Why have cancer treatments remained almost unchanged since the 1950s: toxic radiation, toxic chemotherapy, and surgery?

The answer is simple: treating cancer is profitable; curing it is not. Cancer also furthers the globalist goal of massive depopulation.

Worldwide cases of cancer are likely to rise by nearly 75 percent by 2030 according to a study published in The Lancet Oncology. A team led by Freddie Bray of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in Lyon, France, said that in 2008 there were 12.7 million new cases of cancer, which would rise to 22.2 million by 2030, with 90 percent of the rise occurring in the poorest countries.

In other words, the business forecast for pharmaceutical companies, tax-free cancer foundations and government health organizations is great.

If you still can’t believe that the cancer epidemic is a soft-kill operation, than you should understand Democide. Democide is the murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder. Democide does not include soldiers killed in battle. During the 20th Century (1900s) alone, Professor R.J. Rummel calculates that government power was used to murder approximately 262,000,000 people.

It is well known by nutritionists and true healers that the best way to beat cancer is not to get it. That is, we must have proper nutrition and exercise to keep our immune systems functioning properly. We must also eliminate all forms of toxins from our every-day environment.

BPA. Bisphenol A (BPA) is a widely used chemical that can behave like estrogen. It is used in the manufacture of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. BPA is in many consumer products, including the lining of food and beverage cans, plastic food packaging, dental sealants, paper receipts and water pipes. Exposure in people is widespread and occurs mainly through eating or drinking contaminated food and beverages.

Animal and human studies have linked BPA to hormone-sensitive cancers, including breast and prostate cancers. A recent study form China found that exposure to BPA may be a risk factor for a common type of brain tumor called meningioma. The study participants with the highest urine BPA levels were about 1.6 times (160%) more likely to be diagnosed with meningioma compared to those with lower concentrations.

BPA is found in the urine of 95 percent of adults. Research from Harvard University found that eating canned soup can spike your urinary (BPA) levels by 1,200 percent compared to fresh soup. Canada lists BPA as a “toxic substance” and has banned it from being used in baby bottles. However, in March of 2012, the FDA blocked a ban on BPA in the United States despite its well-proven links to cancer. 4.7 tons of BPA is expected to be made in 2012 by AkzoNobel N.V., Dover Chemical Corporation, The Dow Chemical Company, Huntsman Corporation, Rhodia (Solvay Group), and SI Group, Inc.

While many consumers now wisely refuse to purchase plastic products unless they are BPA free, many plastic manufactures have replaced BPA, with Bisphenol-S (BPS), which may be even more dangerous. Therefore, it is best to avoid plastic products and use glass instead. Unfortunately, almost all bottled water is sold in plastic bottles.

Fluoride. Speaking of water, almost every water district in the United States ads toxic sodium fluoride/hydrofluosilicic acid to our tap water. After years of denial, the CFR/Rockefeller controlled federal government finally admitted that fluoride harms children. Rather than removing the toxins, the federal government called for a reduction in the amount of fluoride added to public water supplies, citing its negative effect on teeth (dental fluorosis). Of course it has long been known by real researchers, as opposed to the American Dental Association, that fluoride harms teeth.

The Harvard School of Dental Health found that fluoridated causes cancer:

New American research suggests that boys exposed to fluoride between the ages of five and 10 will suffer an increased rate of osteosarcoma - bone cancer - between the ages of 10 and 19… The increased cancer risks, identified in a newly available study conducted at the Harvard School of Dental Health, were found at fluoride exposure levels common in both the US and Britain…. Even with DDT, you don't have the consistently strong data that the compound can cause cancer as you now have with fluoride.'

It should also be noted that several unethical water bottling companies add fluoride to their water (Nursery Purified Water - DS Waters, Dannon Fluoride To Go, and others). They advertise that fluoride is great for kids and promotes strong teeth despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Pesticides. The soft-kill cancer operation continued in plain view when California legislators approved the use of methyl iodide on California strawberry crops with knowledge that it was linked to cancer, late-term miscarriages, thyroid disease and neurological damage in humans. In 2007, the Bush administration approved methyl iodine nationally with 47 states registering the chemical for use.

Fortunately, Arysta LifeScience, methyl iodide manufacturer and largest private pesticide corporation in the world, pulled methyl iodide from the U.S. market on March 20, 2012.

Workers who apply certain pesticides to farm fields are twice as likely to contract melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer. Yet we are told that non-organic foods are safe to eat. Likewise, researchers find higher levels of common household pesticides in the urine of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a cancer that develops most commonly between three and seven years of age.

The lingering effects of DDT pesticide use is increased rates of cancer.

Parabens. Cancer-causing chemicals have been added to our personal hygiene products. Parabens are a chemical compound found in everyday toiletry products including moisturizers, make-up, shaving foam, tanning lotions and toothpaste. They are also found in numerous brands of underarm deodorant.

A study of 160 women with breast cancer revealed that parabens were present in the tumors of all the women. “In total, 160 samples were collected, four from each woman. They found 99 per cent of the tissue samples contained at least one paraben and 60 per cent of the samples had five.”

Aluminum. Most antiperspirant contains aluminum, and that aluminum may be absorbed into women’s breast tissue where it could potentially increase the risk of breast cancer or other health problems. Women with breast cancer have higher levels of aluminum in their nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), a fluid present in the breast duct tree. Studies show aluminum from antiperspirants is deposited in breast tissue, and animal studies have also found that aluminum can cause cancer. Studies also classify Aluminum as a neurotoxin associated with Alzheimer’s disease.

Chemtrails/Geoengineering. Chemtrails containing toxins such as Aluminum and Barium are being sprayed into the atmosphere daily as one of the most blatant tools of the depopulation agenda. Therefore, the air we all breathe now contains Aluminum and Barium particles that should not be there. Particle pollution can increase the risk of heart disease, lung cancer and asthma attacks and can interfere with the growth and efficiency of the lungs.

Chemtrails are poisoning all life on the planet and most people fail to even notice. Please take the time to do your own research on chemtrails/geoengineering as it is beyond the scope of this article.

Sunscreen. Many popular sunscreens contain ingredients known to spur the growth and spread of skin cancer cells, which defeats their stated purpose of preventing skin cancer. Even worse, the FDA has allegedly been aware of this critical information for the past ten years, but has done absolutely nothing to warn people about it.

Only 7.8 percent of the sunscreens tested have been deemed "safe and effective." The other 92.2 percent, which represent hundreds of sunscreens on the market today, contain one or more ingredients known to be harmful to health, a shocking figure when considering their widespread use.

Sugar. It has long been known that cancer cells feed on sugar and that those with cancer should reduce their sugar/simple carbohydrate intake. Today Americans are swallowing 22 teaspoons of sugar each day or about 100 pounds per year. One can of soda alone has 39 grams of sugar (8 teaspoons) – thank you Pepsi and Coca-Cola. No wonder so many Americans suffer from cancer.

Common and Medical Radiation. CT scans are associated with increased risks of cancer, yet patients are not warned of the danger. Exposing a child to the nuclear radiation from two or three computed tomography (CT) head scans can triple the risk of developing brain cancer later in life, according to a 20-year study. The study also found that a child exposed to the cumulative radiation of between five and 10 CT scans is three times more likely than an unexposed child to develop leukemia.

Likewise, dental X-rays raise brain cancer risk. A study involving 1,400 cancer patients found that patients who reported having yearly bitewing exams (dental x-rays) were up to two times more likely to develop meningioma.

Mammograms cause cancer by exposing the body to ionizing radiation that can be 1,000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray, which we know poses a cancer risk.

If a woman follows the current guidelines for premenopausal screening, over a 10 year period she would receive a total dosage of about 5 rads. This approximates the level of exposure to radiation of a Japanese woman one mile from the epicenter of atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki." ... [In] a study by Dr. Robert M. Kaplan, the chairman of the department of health services at the School of Public Health at the University of California, Los Angeles... they found 22 percent more invasive breast tumors in the group who had mammograms every two years compared to the group who had just one mammogram over a six-year period.

Following on the heels of recent revelations that X-ray mammography may be contributing to an epidemic of future radiation-induced breast cancers, in a new published in the journal Cancer July 1st, 2012, reports that radiation treatment actually drives breast cancer cells into greater malignancy.

The researchers found that even when radiation kills half of the tumor cells treated, the surviving cells which are resistant to treatment, known as induced breast cancer stem cells (iBCSCs), were up to 30 times more likely to form tumors than the nonirradiated breast cancer cells. In other words, the radiation treatment regresses the total population of cancer cells, generating the false appearance that the treatment is working, but actually increases the ratio of highly malignant to benign cells within that tumor, eventually leading to the iatrogenic (treatment-induced) death of the patient.

Airport Naked Body Pervert Porno Scanners not only violate the Fourth Amendment, but they are linked with increased rates of cancer. There has been a surge in cases of TSA workers developing cancer as a result of their close proximity to radiation-firing devices

Dr. Edward Dauer, head of radiology at Florida Medical Center, says that naked body scanners can cause cancer, particularly in those over age 65 and in women who are said to be genetically prone to developing breast cancer.

Europe has banned airport naked body scanners due to cancer fears. The decision comes after American academic Dr. David Brenner the scanners could deliver up to 20 times more radiation to the skin than previously thought - potentially increasing the risk of skin cancer.

Cell phones. Radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer, according to the World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile phone use in the same "carcinogenic hazard" category as lead, engine exhaust and chloroform.

Radiation has also been linked to DNA damage and cancer. The Office of National Statistics in the United Kingdom discovered a 50 percent increase in frontal and temporal lobe tumors in children during the ten year span covering 1999 to 2009, most likely caused by cell phones.

One in three children under the age of ten currently has a cellphone in their possession. Researchers warn: "Children should only use mobile phones for essential purposes and keep all calls short."

Yet despite the obvious danger, the government requires no radiation or cancer warning on cell phones.

Likewise, laptop computers have been linked to cancer by electromagnetic radiation.

Smart Meters do not just spy on you, they produce electromagnetic radiation that can damage our health and possibly be linked to cancer.

Mercury. Mercury in any form is poisonous, with mercury toxicity most commonly affecting the neurologic, gastrointestinal (GI) and renal organ systems. Poisoning can result from mercury vapor inhalation, mercury ingestion, mercury injection, and absorption of mercury through the skin.

It has been shown that mercury rapidly depletes the immune system. Mercury has also been shown to induce auto-immune diseases. Anything that depletes and disturbs the immune system will increase one’s chances of contracting cancer.

Vaccines. Vaccines are perhaps the ultimate soft-kill weapon that the global elite use against humanity.

Mercury (as Thirmerosal), Aluminum and Formaldehyde (a known carcinogen used for embalming) have been used as a preservative in child-hood vaccines and are still present in many flu shots. There are hundreds if not thousands of studies linking vaccines with cancer and neurological disorders such as Autism.

The infamous soft-kill operation known as the Polio vaccine (1950s - 1960s) delivered the SV-40 Cancer virus to millions of Americans and preceded an explosion in cancer rates. Brave whistleblowers like Doctors Bernice Eddy and Sarah Steward were told to shut-up and ignored as the soft-kill operation was released to the public.

Top Merck vaccine scientist, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, openly admits the presence of deadly SV40 in Polio vaccines . The SV40 Cancer Foundation provides additional research and information.

Meanwhile, the Polio vaccine is still used against unsuspecting citizens of third-world nations.

Recently an Italian court found vaccine makers liable for damaging children. But in the United States, after vaccine makers were nearly wiped-out by lawsuits brought by parents of injured children, Congress granted them legal immunity. The Supreme Court upheld the immunity stating that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.”

Eugenicist Bill Gates and other globalists such as the Rockefeller Foundation fund vaccine research in order to reduce the human population through soft-kill methodology. That is the true reason that many governments are pushing to make vaccines mandatory, even going door-to-door against natural law and the will of informed parents.

Dental Filings. Dental amalgams are the primary source of mercury exposure in Americans. A single dental amalgam filling releases as much as 15 micrograms of mercury per day. The average individual has eight amalgam fillings and could absorb up to 120 micrograms of mercury per day. For comparison, eating mercury-tainted seafood will expose you to about 2.3 micrograms per day.

The National Cancer Institute linked periodontal disease to pancreatic cancer. “Our study provides the first strong evidence that periodontal disease may increase the risk of pancreatic cancer,” said Dr. Dominique Michaud of the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, who led the research. Men with a history of periodontal disease had a 64 per cent increased risk of pancreatic cancer than men with no such history.

Light Bulbs. In 2007, Skull and Bones cult member George W. Bush signed a bill mandating that, “Manufacturers will no longer be able to make the 100-watt Thomas Edison bulb after Jan. 1, 2012, followed by the 75-watt version in Jan. 2013, and the 60- and 40-watt bulbs in Jan. 2014.”

The standard incandescent bulb was to be replaced soft-kill CFL bulbs, which are harmful to humans and the environment because they are filled with toxic mercury. “A report released in 2008 from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection revealed that when a CFL bulb is broken, it can release dangerously high levels of mercury into the air.

Fortunately the planned ban was repealed and you need not pollute your home with toxic CFL bulbs.

High Fructose Corn Syrup. High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is used as a sweetener in thousands of mainstream packaged foods sold in the United States and around the world, from bread to soda and even breakfast cereal.

Researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) found that cancer cells have a particular liking for refined fructose. In tests, pancreatic cancer cells quickly fed on refined fructose and used it to divide and proliferate rapidly within the body.

"These findings show that cancer cells can readily metabolize fructose to increase proliferation," explained Dr. Anthony Heaney of UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center, one of the authors of the study.

Published in the journal Cancer Research, the findings also reveal that not all sugars are the same, a widely held belief in mainstream medicine. Tumor cells love both glucose sugar and fructose sugar, but fructose directly causes cancer cells to reproduce and spread in a way that glucose does not.

The study demonstrates that there is a major difference between high fructose corn syrup, a highly-refined sugar commonly used in processed American foods and beverages, and refined sugar cane. Both can lead to health problems, but high fructose corn syrup is worse in terms of cancer growth.

Additionally, a study conducted by David Wallinga, M.D., entitled "Not So Sweet: Missing Mercury and High Fructose Corn Syrup" (http://healthobservatory.org/library.cfm?refid=105026) reveals that nearly one-third of all grocery items sweetened with HFCS were contaminated with mercury.

The average American consumes 12 teaspoons of HFCS every day! So just by eating the standard American diet of processed foods, consumers are right now potentially exposing themselves to exceedingly high levels of mercury that far surpass the safety limits set by the EPA.

High Fructose Corn Syrup also contributes to obesity. A Princeton University research team demonstrated that rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained significantly more weight than those with access to table sugar, even when their overall caloric intake was the same.

Obesity is linked to higher rates of cancer. According to the American Institute for Cancer Research, more than 100,000 cancer cases in the U.S. are linked to excess body fat - most of them are preventable.

Microwave Ovens. Nearly every home has a microwave oven to quickly heat or cook food. Yet many studies conducted throughout the world have repeatedly highlighted the deleterious effects of microwave ovens on human health. In fact microwave ovens are so dangerous that they were banned in Russia from 1976 to 1987. Twenty years of thorough research by Russian scientists convinced them that the dangers of the devices outweighed the benefits in cooking time.

A recent experiment showed that microwaved water given to a plant causes the plant to wither and die within days; however, another identical plant given water that was boiled on a conventional stove grew normally during the same time period. Therefore, microwave ovens likely alter and destroy your food as well.

Pasteurization was discovered by Louis Pasteur in the mid-1800s. It compromises your milk, Almonds and juice. Pasteurization destroys vitamins, enzymes and interferes with absorption. When you boil a liquid, you kill any bacteria and make that food sterile. In the process, you can't help but affect the taste and nutritional value of that food. Pasteurization is the process of heating a liquid to a high enough temperature to kill certain bacteria and disable certain enzymes.

Food Irradiation (radiation). The FDA approved food irradiation, the brainchild of the Atomic Energy Commission's efforts in the Eisenhower administration to find practical uses for the flood of radioactive wastes from nuclear weapons. Industry and the FDA insist that irradiated food has been thoroughly tested and is absolutely safe. However, New York, New Jersey and Maine have prohibited the sale and distribution of irradiated food, as have foreign governments, including Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Australia and New Zealand. Claims of safety are unproven at best.

Studies have linked food irradiation with increased risk of cancer.

Aspartame. The average person consumes about 2 or 3 mg/kg aspartame each day through diet soda and artificial sweeteners. A study of rats links low doses of aspartame -- the sweetener in NutraSweet, Equal, and thousands of consumer products -- to leukemia and lymphoma.

"Our study has shown that aspartame is a multipotential carcinogenic compound whose carcinogenic effects are also evident at a daily dose of 20 milligrams per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg), notably less than the current acceptable daily intake for humans," the authors write.

Donald Rumsfeld, best known for slaughtering Iraqis that had nothing to do with 9/11, is largely responsible for foisting the Aspartame soft-kill operation on the public.

Chlorine. Chlorine has been used to disinfect U.S. and British tap water supplies for 100 years. Low levels of chlorine in tap water used for bathing can almost double the risk of bladder cancer. Swimming in public pools can also present a risk because chlorine levels are much higher.

Researchers found that those living in areas with high-chlorine content water, who bathed in it regularly, were 83 per cent more likely to get a tumor than those in low-chlorine areas. Those who drank high-chlorine tap water were 35 per cent more likely to get bladder cancer. Regular swimming in pools increased the risk by 57 per cent.

Absorbing chlorine through the skin is thought to be more dangerous because it bypasses the liver, which filters out many harmful chemicals when water is swallowed.

It should be noted that many baby diapers and feminine products (pads/tampons) contain chlorine as the soft-kill operations rolls on.

Sodium Nitrate and other preservatives are commonly added to processed meat (cold cuts) and are linked with increased rates of cancer. It is best to buy preservative-free meat to avoid being soft-killed by cancer.

Nuclear Radiation is also a favorite soft-kill tool as radiation deaths are far more difficult to prove than cigarette smoking deaths, because the source is almost always unknown in its quantity, who it was delivered to, and when.

Contrary to government propaganda distributed by the mainstream media, there is no safe dose of radiation.

A French study published in the International Journal of Cancer found a leukemia rate twice as high among children under the age of 15 living within a 3.1-mile radius of France's 19 nuclear power plants. The study added to the findings of a German study published in late 2007 studying German children under 5 years old, which found that children of that age in the vicinity of German NPPs had suffered an increase in the incidence of childhood leukemia.

In 2003, a blue ribbon European Committee on Radiation Risk reported 61,600,000 cancer deaths worldwide from fallout of atom bomb testing during the 1950s and 1960s. Rain brought the fallout back down into the food supply.

This radioactive fallout, as it is called, carries something that's called strontium-90, which is the most dreadful poison in the world. For only one tablespoon equally shared by all the members of the human race could produce a dangerous level of radioactivity in the bones of every individual.

Lab tests found that children born in 1963 had about 50 times more Sr-90 in teeth than those born in 1950. Washington University officials used their results in testimony to the U.S. Senate leading to the Partial Test Ban Treaty signed by President John F. Kennedy, ending all above-ground atom bomb tests.

A book published by three prominent scientists concluded that based on records now available, some 985,000 people died, mainly of cancer, as a result of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident. That is between when the accident occurred in 1986 and 2004. More deaths, it projects, will follow.

Evidence demonstrates that the Fukushima nuclear debacle is being used as a soft-kill operation, as absolutely nothing significant is being done to stop the continuous leak of radiation. The Fukushima disaster was entirely foreseen by prominent scientist such as Leuren Moret but her warning went unheeded.

Arnold Gunderson, a 39-year veteran of the nuclear industry, stated:

The numbers I’ve seen, from reputable scientists, are that Fukushima is going to kill 200,000 from increased cancers over the next 50 years.

Likewise, Dr. Christopher Busby, Scientific Secretary of the European Committee on Radiation Risk, states that 400,000 people will develop cancer within a 200 kilometer radius of Fukushima.

One estimate states that the fallout from the Fukushima nuclear meltdown resulted in 21,851 U.S. deaths within the first 14 weeks of the emergency. The rise in reported deaths after Fukushima was largest among the United States for infants under age one.

GM Crops may cause cancer. Dr. Stanley Ewen, a consultant histopathologist at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, says that a cauliflower [mosaic] virus used in GM foods could increase the risk of stomach and colon cancers.

Monsanto’s GM-derived rBGH (which is a genetically-altered growth hormone given to dairy cows to make them more milk) was shown to increase the production of IGF-1 from 70-1000%. IGF-1 is a very powerful hormone that has been linked to a 2.5-4 times higher incidence of human colon, breast and prostate cancer.

Conclusion

The global elite have clearly implemented their depopulation agenda and are spiking our food, air, water and bodies with toxins to give us cancer. These elites then profit immensely by selling us drugs through the pharmaceutical companies they control. These drugs normally provide temporary relief from cancer/disease systems, while being falsely marketed as a cure by fake studies and perverted statistics.

Fight cancer by not getting it. Please share the knowledge obtained from this research and links provided herein.

Lastly, the following resources may be helpful if you or someone you know has cancer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSCxVtePTh8

http://www.worldwithoutcancer.org.uk/

http://apricotsfromgod.info/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGsSEqsGLWM

http://www.cancertutor.com/http://www.cancertruth.net/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1383240/Boy-brain-cancer-cured-secretly-fed-medical-marijuana-father.html

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070417193338.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSXhwP5QjUQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl6szBDCh5w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTGye7kA6rM