![Pakistan Cyber Force [Official]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_v8KgP921SzsPX60acERTu3tmV8n7vAKXbRbbdUjZpune2tMZ6hiQCN7Ne0n5vDSvhjkSh5wPeUAmxPHydjglrBEg5w0hVDtVs7wzkELl_GGRifsudxdw=s0-d)
In her article published in The News on 20th November 2011, the anchor person of JEW TV, Sana Buchha claimed that the Pakistan Resolution was drafted by an Ahmadi named Muhammad Zafrullah Khan, who was part of Muslim League.
She writes:
It surprises me that we have forgotten those very people who helped draft the resolution that gave us Pakistan. Mohammad Zafarullah Khan was an Ahmadi but it was he who drafted the Pakistan Resolution and represented the Muslim League’s view when it came to deciding the future boundaries between India and Pakistan.
So, now for the sake of argument, lets just accept her claim and keeping in mind her article as a whole, lets try to carve out a conclusion about what she wanted to persue.
First of all, relating the Eid ul Azha, which a moment of happiness with so many tragedies, she is trying to minimize all the scarce universal happiness that we get just twice in the year in the form of Eid.
Secondly, if the resolution was drafted by an Ahmadi and Quaid had no objection over it (which is a flat lie as proven below), should we declare Ahmadis as muslims who have been declared infidels by the unanimous resolution of Parliament in 1973's constitution? This means that she is openly challenging the constitution and mocking Khatm-e-Nabuwat.
Thirdly, she is accusing Quaid of being a liberal, which a faction of fatuous people believe just because of the reason that they can't differentiate between liberalism and freedom of faith, Quaid believed in the latter one! Never did he claim that he believed in liberalism.
First of all, relating the Eid ul Azha, which a moment of happiness with so many tragedies, she is trying to minimize all the scarce universal happiness that we get just twice in the year in the form of Eid.
Secondly, if the resolution was drafted by an Ahmadi and Quaid had no objection over it (which is a flat lie as proven below), should we declare Ahmadis as muslims who have been declared infidels by the unanimous resolution of Parliament in 1973's constitution? This means that she is openly challenging the constitution and mocking Khatm-e-Nabuwat.
Thirdly, she is accusing Quaid of being a liberal, which a faction of fatuous people believe just because of the reason that they can't differentiate between liberalism and freedom of faith, Quaid believed in the latter one! Never did he claim that he believed in liberalism.
Quaid-e-Azam clearly said that:
We didn't demand Pakistan just to have a piece of land, but we wanted a laboratory where we could practice on Islamic principles.
This quote shows the pure Islamic thoughts of Quaid-e-Azam free of any other isms. Madam Sana forgot that in a speech in october 1947 which is also present on youtube Quaid-e-Azam clearly said that:
You are only voicing my sentiments and the sentiments of millions of Musalmaans, When you say that Pakistan should be based on the pure foundation of justice and Islamic... Islamic socialism.. not other isms!
So, Miss Sana Buchha has completely compromised the sentiments of Millions of Musalmans by calling Quaid-e-Azam liberal, and that he followed liberalism.
Now lets have a detailed examination of Muhammad Zafrullah Khan's role in the struggle movement for Pakistan.
Dr. Safdar Mehmood, an urdu columnist throws some light on the historical background of Pakistan resolution in one of his article. He states that if Pakistan Resolution was actually drafted by Muhammad Zafrullah Khan, i would have accepted it, but turning the pages of history, the picture is completely different. For this, Miss Sana Buchha shoud read the book 'Evolution for Pakistan' written by Shareefuddin Pirzada. I agree that the image of Shareefuddin in quite controversial in the present perspective, but in past he has been an active member of the struggle for Pakistan and his position in that regard cannot be doubted in any way. Being the secretary of Quaid-e-Azam, he holds a very important position.
Mian Noor Ahmad in his book 'Noor-e-baseerat Kalaam-e-Iqbal ki roshni mai' writes:
"First of all, this should be quite much clear in our wits that Pakistan was achieved on the basis of Islamic nationalism, the idea which was given to Muslims by Allama Muhammad Iqbal, and that was the only driving force that led the muslims to pass the unanimous Pakistan resolution. The ideological background to Quaid-e-Azam was given by non other but Allama Iqbal, Allama Iqbal was of the opinion that how can Islam be encaged and Muslim be free(liberal), keeping in mind that Quaid-e-Azam followed Allama Iqbal directed him to do, now lets see the stance of Allama Iqbal about liberalism(Picture on right).
If the muslims required the state of Madina, how is it possible that they didn't needed the state of Pakistan?" [Page-202]
This is a very well known fact that the quest for Pakistan was first officially made public by Muslim League of Sindh. When All Indian Muslim League decided to hold a public gathering in March 1940 to put forward a demand for Pakistan, the English Govenrment tried their level best to get the gathering postponed and for this purpose they launched their special men in the shape of Muhammad Zafrullah Khan who was later awarded with the title of 'Sir' for his services by the British crown, and the premier of Punjab 'Sir' Sikandar Hayat, but despite all their pressure, Quaid-e-Azam remained unmoved! History bears witness that the Viceroy of India at that time, Lord Linlithgow, 0n 29th March 1939, announced that India will soon be given a dominion status i.e they will soon be given independence. Muhammad Zafrullah Khan worte a note to viceroy analysing the stance of Muslim League and Congress and held the division of India was impossible and it should remain united.
The question to be asked here is that a person who wrote a letter to Viceroy and showing his stance about the division of India so bluntly, how on earth can he be the drafter of Pakistan Resolution, the very next year? The answer to this very critical question can only be given by Miss Sana Buchha!
Shareefuddin Pirzada in his book clearly states that in a statement Mr. Zafrullah Khan bluntly said that he never presented any sort of formula for the division of Pakistan and hence it is impossible that Quaid-e-Azam gave any heed to his opinion [Page-208].
On the other hand, Sir Sikandar Hayat on 11 March 1941 in the Punjab Assembly revealed that the original draft of Pakistan Resolution was made by him but Muslim League, after several amendments, completely changed the shape of the original draft. Obviously, Mr. sikanadar could not lie standing in Punjab Assembly as all the politicians of that time very well alive. The fact that Muslim League never confuted his statement makes the picture even clearer!
The knowledge of Miss Sana Buchha in this regard is nothing more than a regular Wikipedia reader which is often a cock and bull story and which is notorious for maligning and molding the historical events according to the desires of Enemies of Islam. Miss Sana Buchha's complete bullying and misquoting of all the historical aspects of Pakistan Resolution, clearly shows on whose agenda she is working. This is not the first time that Miss Sana Buchha is molding the facts and figures to meet the interests of the masters of Jew TV which is very well known to be working on foriegn agenda and has its connection with secret socities.
It all started back in 2008 with the 26/11 Mumbai Fiasco was conducted and the lauch of her program 'Crisis Cell' on Jew TV was quite critical keeping upto the situation, she did hell of a propaganda against Pakistan speaking the language of RAW, and now she is maligning the history in the manner that the defeatist minded members of SAFMA do. We warn her that we are noting down each and every trecherous act of her, and she will have to pay for all this... very soon!
It all started back in 2008 with the 26/11 Mumbai Fiasco was conducted and the lauch of her program 'Crisis Cell' on Jew TV was quite critical keeping upto the situation, she did hell of a propaganda against Pakistan speaking the language of RAW, and now she is maligning the history in the manner that the defeatist minded members of SAFMA do. We warn her that we are noting down each and every trecherous act of her, and she will have to pay for all this... very soon!
Written By: Faraan Khan
Pakistan Cyber Force
0 Comments
