- Subscribe to PCF Networked Blog Daily Updates
- Subscribe to our Twitter / Google / Yahoo Daily Updates
In earlier
times it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill a
million people. Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people then to
control a million people. - Zbigniew Brzezinski (Council on Foreign Relations,
Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Carter/Obama Advisor)
The cancer
epidemic is a soft-kill operation and a move by the world’s so-called elites to
cull the human population. It is well documented that the Club of Rome, Bill
Gates, Ted Turner, the Rockefellers, Warren Buffet and many other globalists
plan to dominate and decimate humanity with their population reduction agenda.
As we will
see, the globalists first cause the cancer and then provide us with their
ineffective treatments (not cures) for profit. This method is known as Problem
– Reaction – Solution.
According
to the American Cancer Society, 1,638,910 new cancer cases will arise in the
United States during 2012. Approximately 577,190 American cancer patients are
expected to die from their cancer this year as well. One in every two men will
suffer from cancer (one in four will die) as will one in every three women (one
in five will die). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
cancer is the second leading cause of death, closely trailing heart disease.
In 1971,
President Nixon and Congress declared war on cancer. Since then, the federal
government has spent well over $105 billion to battle cancer. In 2010 alone,
the National Cancer Institute had a budget of $6.4 billion. As of March 2011,
the Susan B. Komen Foundation, allegedly leading the fight against breast cancer,
had $439,451,449 in “total public support and revenue.” Pharmaceutical giant
Merck alone had a 2010 research and development budget of 8.12 billion.
Why all the
death and suffering despite billions, if not trillions, in government and
private cancer research? Why have cancer treatments remained almost unchanged
since the 1950s: toxic radiation, toxic chemotherapy, and surgery?
The answer
is simple: treating cancer is profitable; curing it is not. Cancer also
furthers the globalist goal of massive depopulation.
Worldwide
cases of cancer are likely to rise by nearly 75 percent by 2030 according to a
study published in The Lancet Oncology. A team led by Freddie Bray of the
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in Lyon, France, said that
in 2008 there were 12.7 million new cases of cancer, which would rise to 22.2
million by 2030, with 90 percent of the rise occurring in the poorest countries.
In other
words, the business forecast for pharmaceutical companies, tax-free cancer
foundations and government health organizations is great.
If you
still can’t believe that the cancer epidemic is a soft-kill operation, than you
should understand Democide. Democide is the murder of any person or people by a
government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder. Democide does not
include soldiers killed in battle. During the 20th Century (1900s) alone,
Professor R.J. Rummel calculates that government power was used to murder
approximately 262,000,000 people.
It is well
known by nutritionists and true healers that the best way to beat cancer is not
to get it. That is, we must have proper nutrition and exercise to keep our
immune systems functioning properly. We must also eliminate all forms of toxins
from our every-day environment.
BPA.
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a widely used chemical that can behave like estrogen. It
is used in the manufacture of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. BPA is
in many consumer products, including the lining of food and beverage cans,
plastic food packaging, dental sealants, paper receipts and water pipes.
Exposure in people is widespread and occurs mainly through eating or drinking
contaminated food and beverages.
Animal and
human studies have linked BPA to hormone-sensitive cancers, including breast
and prostate cancers. A recent study form China found that exposure to BPA may
be a risk factor for a common type of brain tumor called meningioma. The study
participants with the highest urine BPA levels were about 1.6 times (160%) more
likely to be diagnosed with meningioma compared to those with lower
concentrations.
BPA is
found in the urine of 95 percent of adults. Research from Harvard University
found that eating canned soup can spike your urinary (BPA) levels by 1,200
percent compared to fresh soup. Canada lists BPA as a “toxic substance” and has
banned it from being used in baby bottles. However, in March of 2012, the FDA
blocked a ban on BPA in the United States despite its well-proven links to
cancer. 4.7 tons of BPA is expected to be made in 2012 by AkzoNobel N.V., Dover
Chemical Corporation, The Dow Chemical Company, Huntsman Corporation, Rhodia
(Solvay Group), and SI Group, Inc.
While many
consumers now wisely refuse to purchase plastic products unless they are BPA
free, many plastic manufactures have replaced BPA, with Bisphenol-S (BPS),
which may be even more dangerous. Therefore, it is best to avoid plastic
products and use glass instead. Unfortunately, almost all bottled water is sold
in plastic bottles.
Fluoride.
Speaking of water, almost every water district in the United States ads toxic
sodium fluoride/hydrofluosilicic acid to our tap water. After years of denial,
the CFR/Rockefeller controlled federal government finally admitted that
fluoride harms children. Rather than removing the toxins, the federal
government called for a reduction in the amount of fluoride added to public
water supplies, citing its negative effect on teeth (dental fluorosis). Of
course it has long been known by real researchers, as opposed to the American
Dental Association, that fluoride harms teeth.
The Harvard
School of Dental Health found that fluoridated causes cancer:
New
American research suggests that boys exposed to fluoride between the ages of
five and 10 will suffer an increased rate of osteosarcoma - bone cancer -
between the ages of 10 and 19… The increased cancer risks, identified in a
newly available study conducted at the Harvard School of Dental Health, were
found at fluoride exposure levels common in both the US and Britain…. Even with
DDT, you don't have the consistently strong data that the compound can cause
cancer as you now have with fluoride.'
It should
also be noted that several unethical water bottling companies add fluoride to
their water (Nursery Purified Water - DS Waters, Dannon Fluoride To Go, and
others). They advertise that fluoride is great for kids and promotes strong
teeth despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Pesticides.
The soft-kill cancer operation continued in plain view when California
legislators approved the use of methyl iodide on California strawberry crops
with knowledge that it was linked to cancer, late-term miscarriages, thyroid
disease and neurological damage in humans. In 2007, the Bush administration
approved methyl iodine nationally with 47 states registering the chemical for
use.
Fortunately,
Arysta LifeScience, methyl iodide manufacturer and largest private pesticide
corporation in the world, pulled methyl iodide from the U.S. market on March
20, 2012.
Workers who
apply certain pesticides to farm fields are twice as likely to contract
melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer. Yet we are told that non-organic foods
are safe to eat. Likewise, researchers find higher levels of common household
pesticides in the urine of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a cancer
that develops most commonly between three and seven years of age.
The
lingering effects of DDT pesticide use is increased rates of cancer.
Parabens.
Cancer-causing chemicals have been added to our personal hygiene products.
Parabens are a chemical compound found in everyday toiletry products including
moisturizers, make-up, shaving foam, tanning lotions and toothpaste. They are
also found in numerous brands of underarm deodorant.
A study of
160 women with breast cancer revealed that parabens were present in the tumors
of all the women. “In total, 160 samples were collected, four from each woman.
They found 99 per cent of the tissue samples contained at least one paraben and
60 per cent of the samples had five.”
Aluminum.
Most antiperspirant contains aluminum, and that aluminum may be absorbed into
women’s breast tissue where it could potentially increase the risk of breast cancer
or other health problems. Women with breast cancer have higher levels of
aluminum in their nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), a fluid present in the breast
duct tree. Studies show aluminum from antiperspirants is deposited in breast
tissue, and animal studies have also found that aluminum can cause cancer.
Studies also classify Aluminum as a neurotoxin associated with Alzheimer’s
disease.
Chemtrails/Geoengineering.
Chemtrails containing toxins such as Aluminum and Barium are being sprayed into
the atmosphere daily as one of the most blatant tools of the depopulation
agenda. Therefore, the air we all breathe now contains Aluminum and Barium
particles that should not be there. Particle pollution can increase the risk of
heart disease, lung cancer and asthma attacks and can interfere with the growth
and efficiency of the lungs.
Chemtrails
are poisoning all life on the planet and most people fail to even notice.
Please take the time to do your own research on chemtrails/geoengineering as it
is beyond the scope of this article.
Sunscreen.
Many popular sunscreens contain ingredients known to spur the growth and spread
of skin cancer cells, which defeats their stated purpose of preventing skin
cancer. Even worse, the FDA has allegedly been aware of this critical
information for the past ten years, but has done absolutely nothing to warn
people about it.
Only 7.8
percent of the sunscreens tested have been deemed "safe and
effective." The other 92.2 percent, which represent hundreds of sunscreens
on the market today, contain one or more ingredients known to be harmful to
health, a shocking figure when considering their widespread use.
Sugar. It
has long been known that cancer cells feed on sugar and that those with cancer
should reduce their sugar/simple carbohydrate intake. Today Americans are
swallowing 22 teaspoons of sugar each day or about 100 pounds per year. One can
of soda alone has 39 grams of sugar (8 teaspoons) – thank you Pepsi and
Coca-Cola. No wonder so many Americans suffer from cancer.
Common and
Medical Radiation. CT scans are associated with increased risks of cancer, yet
patients are not warned of the danger. Exposing a child to the nuclear
radiation from two or three computed tomography (CT) head scans can triple the
risk of developing brain cancer later in life, according to a 20-year study.
The study also found that a child exposed to the cumulative radiation of
between five and 10 CT scans is three times more likely than an unexposed child
to develop leukemia.
Likewise,
dental X-rays raise brain cancer risk. A study involving 1,400 cancer patients
found that patients who reported having yearly bitewing exams (dental x-rays)
were up to two times more likely to develop meningioma.
Mammograms
cause cancer by exposing the body to ionizing radiation that can be 1,000 times
greater than that from a chest x-ray, which we know poses a cancer risk.
If a woman
follows the current guidelines for premenopausal screening, over a 10 year
period she would receive a total dosage of about 5 rads. This approximates the
level of exposure to radiation of a Japanese woman one mile from the epicenter
of atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki." ... [In] a study by Dr.
Robert M. Kaplan, the chairman of the department of health services at the
School of Public Health at the University of California, Los Angeles... they
found 22 percent more invasive breast tumors in the group who had mammograms
every two years compared to the group who had just one mammogram over a
six-year period.
Following
on the heels of recent revelations that X-ray mammography may be contributing
to an epidemic of future radiation-induced breast cancers, in a new published
in the journal Cancer July 1st, 2012, reports that radiation treatment actually
drives breast cancer cells into greater malignancy.
The
researchers found that even when radiation kills half of the tumor cells
treated, the surviving cells which are resistant to treatment, known as induced
breast cancer stem cells (iBCSCs), were up to 30 times more likely to form
tumors than the nonirradiated breast cancer cells. In other words, the
radiation treatment regresses the total population of cancer cells, generating
the false appearance that the treatment is working, but actually increases the
ratio of highly malignant to benign cells within that tumor, eventually leading
to the iatrogenic (treatment-induced) death of the patient.
Airport
Naked Body Pervert Porno Scanners not only violate the Fourth Amendment, but
they are linked with increased rates of cancer. There has been a surge in cases
of TSA workers developing cancer as a result of their close proximity to
radiation-firing devices
Dr. Edward
Dauer, head of radiology at Florida Medical Center, says that naked body
scanners can cause cancer, particularly in those over age 65 and in women who
are said to be genetically prone to developing breast cancer.
Europe has
banned airport naked body scanners due to cancer fears. The decision comes
after American academic Dr. David Brenner the scanners could deliver up to 20
times more radiation to the skin than previously thought - potentially
increasing the risk of skin cancer.
Cell
phones. Radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer, according to the
World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile phone use in the same
"carcinogenic hazard" category as lead, engine exhaust and
chloroform.
Radiation
has also been linked to DNA damage and cancer. The Office of National
Statistics in the United Kingdom discovered a 50 percent increase in frontal
and temporal lobe tumors in children during the ten year span covering 1999 to
2009, most likely caused by cell phones.
One in
three children under the age of ten currently has a cellphone in their
possession. Researchers warn: "Children should only use mobile phones for
essential purposes and keep all calls short."
Yet despite
the obvious danger, the government requires no radiation or cancer warning on
cell phones.
Likewise,
laptop computers have been linked to cancer by electromagnetic radiation.
Smart
Meters do not just spy on you, they produce electromagnetic radiation that can
damage our health and possibly be linked to cancer.
Mercury.
Mercury in any form is poisonous, with mercury toxicity most commonly affecting
the neurologic, gastrointestinal (GI) and renal organ systems. Poisoning can
result from mercury vapor inhalation, mercury ingestion, mercury injection, and
absorption of mercury through the skin.
It has been
shown that mercury rapidly depletes the immune system. Mercury has also been
shown to induce auto-immune diseases. Anything that depletes and disturbs the
immune system will increase one’s chances of contracting cancer.
Vaccines.
Vaccines are perhaps the ultimate soft-kill weapon that the global elite use
against humanity.
Mercury (as
Thirmerosal), Aluminum and Formaldehyde (a known carcinogen used for embalming)
have been used as a preservative in child-hood vaccines and are still present
in many flu shots. There are hundreds if not thousands of studies linking
vaccines with cancer and neurological disorders such as Autism.
The
infamous soft-kill operation known as the Polio vaccine (1950s - 1960s)
delivered the SV-40 Cancer virus to millions of Americans and preceded an
explosion in cancer rates. Brave whistleblowers like Doctors Bernice Eddy and
Sarah Steward were told to shut-up and ignored as the soft-kill operation was
released to the public.
Top Merck
vaccine scientist, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, openly admits the presence of deadly
SV40 in Polio vaccines . The SV40 Cancer Foundation provides additional
research and information.
Meanwhile,
the Polio vaccine is still used against unsuspecting citizens of third-world nations.
Recently an
Italian court found vaccine makers liable for damaging children. But in the
United States, after vaccine makers were nearly wiped-out by lawsuits brought
by parents of injured children, Congress granted them legal immunity. The Supreme
Court upheld the immunity stating that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.”
Eugenicist
Bill Gates and other globalists such as the Rockefeller Foundation fund vaccine
research in order to reduce the human population through soft-kill methodology.
That is the true reason that many governments are pushing to make vaccines
mandatory, even going door-to-door against natural law and the will of informed
parents.
Dental
Filings. Dental amalgams are the primary source of mercury exposure in
Americans. A single dental amalgam filling releases as much as 15 micrograms of
mercury per day. The average individual has eight amalgam fillings and could
absorb up to 120 micrograms of mercury per day. For comparison, eating
mercury-tainted seafood will expose you to about 2.3 micrograms per day.
The
National Cancer Institute linked periodontal disease to pancreatic cancer. “Our
study provides the first strong evidence that periodontal disease may increase
the risk of pancreatic cancer,” said Dr. Dominique Michaud of the Harvard
School of Public Health in Boston, who led the research. Men with a history of
periodontal disease had a 64 per cent increased risk of pancreatic cancer than
men with no such history.
Light
Bulbs. In 2007, Skull and Bones cult member George W. Bush signed a bill
mandating that, “Manufacturers will no longer be able to make the 100-watt
Thomas Edison bulb after Jan. 1, 2012, followed by the 75-watt version in Jan.
2013, and the 60- and 40-watt bulbs in Jan. 2014.”
The
standard incandescent bulb was to be replaced soft-kill CFL bulbs, which are
harmful to humans and the environment because they are filled with toxic
mercury. “A report released in 2008 from the Maine Department of Environmental
Protection revealed that when a CFL bulb is broken, it can release dangerously
high levels of mercury into the air.
Fortunately
the planned ban was repealed and you need not pollute your home with toxic CFL
bulbs.
High
Fructose Corn Syrup. High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is used as a sweetener in
thousands of mainstream packaged foods sold in the United States and around the
world, from bread to soda and even breakfast cereal.
Researchers
from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) found that cancer cells
have a particular liking for refined fructose. In tests, pancreatic cancer
cells quickly fed on refined fructose and used it to divide and proliferate
rapidly within the body.
"These
findings show that cancer cells can readily metabolize fructose to increase
proliferation," explained Dr. Anthony Heaney of UCLA's Jonsson Cancer
Center, one of the authors of the study.
Published
in the journal Cancer Research, the findings also reveal that not all sugars
are the same, a widely held belief in mainstream medicine. Tumor cells love
both glucose sugar and fructose sugar, but fructose directly causes cancer
cells to reproduce and spread in a way that glucose does not.
The study
demonstrates that there is a major difference between high fructose corn syrup,
a highly-refined sugar commonly used in processed American foods and beverages,
and refined sugar cane. Both can lead to health problems, but high fructose
corn syrup is worse in terms of cancer growth.
Additionally,
a study conducted by David Wallinga, M.D., entitled "Not So Sweet: Missing
Mercury and High Fructose Corn Syrup"
(http://healthobservatory.org/library.cfm?refid=105026) reveals that nearly
one-third of all grocery items sweetened with HFCS were contaminated with
mercury.
The average
American consumes 12 teaspoons of HFCS every day! So just by eating the
standard American diet of processed foods, consumers are right now potentially
exposing themselves to exceedingly high levels of mercury that far surpass the
safety limits set by the EPA.
High
Fructose Corn Syrup also contributes to obesity. A Princeton University
research team demonstrated that rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup
gained significantly more weight than those with access to table sugar, even
when their overall caloric intake was the same.
Obesity is
linked to higher rates of cancer. According to the American Institute for
Cancer Research, more than 100,000 cancer cases in the U.S. are linked to
excess body fat - most of them are preventable.
Microwave
Ovens. Nearly every home has a microwave oven to quickly heat or cook food. Yet
many studies conducted throughout the world have repeatedly highlighted the
deleterious effects of microwave ovens on human health. In fact microwave ovens
are so dangerous that they were banned in Russia from 1976 to 1987. Twenty
years of thorough research by Russian scientists convinced them that the dangers
of the devices outweighed the benefits in cooking time.
A recent
experiment showed that microwaved water given to a plant causes the plant to
wither and die within days; however, another identical plant given water that
was boiled on a conventional stove grew normally during the same time period.
Therefore, microwave ovens likely alter and destroy your food as well.
Pasteurization
was discovered by Louis Pasteur in the mid-1800s. It compromises your milk,
Almonds and juice. Pasteurization destroys vitamins, enzymes and interferes
with absorption. When you boil a liquid, you kill any bacteria and make that
food sterile. In the process, you can't help but affect the taste and
nutritional value of that food. Pasteurization is the process of heating a liquid
to a high enough temperature to kill certain bacteria and disable certain
enzymes.
Food
Irradiation (radiation). The FDA approved food irradiation, the brainchild of
the Atomic Energy Commission's efforts in the Eisenhower administration to find
practical uses for the flood of radioactive wastes from nuclear weapons.
Industry and the FDA insist that irradiated food has been thoroughly tested and
is absolutely safe. However, New York, New Jersey and Maine have prohibited the
sale and distribution of irradiated food, as have foreign governments,
including Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Australia and New Zealand. Claims of safety
are unproven at best.
Studies
have linked food irradiation with increased risk of cancer.
Aspartame.
The average person consumes about 2 or 3 mg/kg aspartame each day through diet
soda and artificial sweeteners. A study of rats links low doses of aspartame --
the sweetener in NutraSweet, Equal, and thousands of consumer products -- to
leukemia and lymphoma.
"Our
study has shown that aspartame is a multipotential carcinogenic compound whose
carcinogenic effects are also evident at a daily dose of 20 milligrams per
kilogram of body weight (mg/kg), notably less than the current acceptable daily
intake for humans," the authors write.
Donald
Rumsfeld, best known for slaughtering Iraqis that had nothing to do with 9/11,
is largely responsible for foisting the Aspartame soft-kill operation on the
public.
Chlorine.
Chlorine has been used to disinfect U.S. and British tap water supplies for 100
years. Low levels of chlorine in tap water used for bathing can almost double
the risk of bladder cancer. Swimming in public pools can also present a risk
because chlorine levels are much higher.
Researchers
found that those living in areas with high-chlorine content water, who bathed
in it regularly, were 83 per cent more likely to get a tumor than those in
low-chlorine areas. Those who drank high-chlorine tap water were 35 per cent
more likely to get bladder cancer. Regular swimming in pools increased the risk
by 57 per cent.
Absorbing
chlorine through the skin is thought to be more dangerous because it bypasses
the liver, which filters out many harmful chemicals when water is swallowed.
It should
be noted that many baby diapers and feminine products (pads/tampons) contain
chlorine as the soft-kill operations rolls on.
Sodium
Nitrate and other preservatives are commonly added to processed meat (cold
cuts) and are linked with increased rates of cancer. It is best to buy
preservative-free meat to avoid being soft-killed by cancer.
Nuclear
Radiation is also a favorite soft-kill tool as radiation deaths are far more
difficult to prove than cigarette smoking deaths, because the source is almost
always unknown in its quantity, who it was delivered to, and when.
Contrary to
government propaganda distributed by the mainstream media, there is no safe
dose of radiation.
A French
study published in the International Journal of Cancer found a leukemia rate
twice as high among children under the age of 15 living within a 3.1-mile
radius of France's 19 nuclear power plants. The study added to the findings of
a German study published in late 2007 studying German children under 5 years
old, which found that children of that age in the vicinity of German NPPs had
suffered an increase in the incidence of childhood leukemia.
In 2003, a
blue ribbon European Committee on Radiation Risk reported 61,600,000 cancer
deaths worldwide from fallout of atom bomb testing during the 1950s and 1960s.
Rain brought the fallout back down into the food supply.
This
radioactive fallout, as it is called, carries something that's called
strontium-90, which is the most dreadful poison in the world. For only one
tablespoon equally shared by all the members of the human race could produce a
dangerous level of radioactivity in the bones of every individual.
Lab tests
found that children born in 1963 had about 50 times more Sr-90 in teeth than
those born in 1950. Washington University officials used their results in
testimony to the U.S. Senate leading to the Partial Test Ban Treaty signed by
President John F. Kennedy, ending all above-ground atom bomb tests.
A book
published by three prominent scientists concluded that based on records now
available, some 985,000 people died, mainly of cancer, as a result of the
Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident. That is between when the accident occurred
in 1986 and 2004. More deaths, it projects, will follow.
Evidence
demonstrates that the Fukushima nuclear debacle is being used as a soft-kill
operation, as absolutely nothing significant is being done to stop the
continuous leak of radiation. The Fukushima disaster was entirely foreseen by
prominent scientist such as Leuren Moret but her warning went unheeded.
Arnold
Gunderson, a 39-year veteran of the nuclear industry, stated:
The numbers
I’ve seen, from reputable scientists, are that Fukushima is going to kill
200,000 from increased cancers over the next 50 years.
Likewise,
Dr. Christopher Busby, Scientific Secretary of the European Committee on
Radiation Risk, states that 400,000 people will develop cancer within a 200
kilometer radius of Fukushima.
One
estimate states that the fallout from the Fukushima nuclear meltdown resulted
in 21,851 U.S. deaths within the first 14 weeks of the emergency. The rise in
reported deaths after Fukushima was largest among the United States for infants
under age one.
GM Crops
may cause cancer. Dr. Stanley Ewen, a consultant histopathologist at Aberdeen
Royal Infirmary, says that a cauliflower [mosaic] virus used in GM foods could
increase the risk of stomach and colon cancers.
Monsanto’s
GM-derived rBGH (which is a genetically-altered growth hormone given to dairy
cows to make them more milk) was shown to increase the production of IGF-1 from
70-1000%. IGF-1 is a very powerful hormone that has been linked to a 2.5-4
times higher incidence of human colon, breast and prostate cancer.
Conclusion
The global
elite have clearly implemented their depopulation agenda and are spiking our
food, air, water and bodies with toxins to give us cancer. These elites then
profit immensely by selling us drugs through the pharmaceutical companies they
control. These drugs normally provide temporary relief from cancer/disease
systems, while being falsely marketed as a cure by fake studies and perverted
statistics.
Fight
cancer by not getting it. Please share the knowledge obtained from this
research and links provided herein.
Lastly, the
following resources may be helpful if you or someone you know has cancer:
(activist post)
Pakistan Cyber Force
No comments:
Post a Comment